Or was it
an accidental analogy?
.
Aisha: Number 17 in the
series…
Zahara: Of?
.
Aisha: I’m talking about the
Number One Ladies Detective Agency. The author claims to be non-political, but
I can’t help but wonder about the ending of Precious and Grace.
.
Zahara: Where Violet
Sephotho wins the election by buying votes?
.
Aisha: And he writes, “How
could Botswana, of all places, choose as Woman of the Year a person as
self-seeking as Violet Sephotho? Did people not realize? Were people such poor
judges of character as to be unable to see Violet for what she was?”
.
Zahara: Yes, but the reply
is, “There are many things in this world that are not right.”
________________
Voice-over
Was it a coincidence that
Precious and Grace appeared in September 2016 just before the U.S. elections
were being decided? Did Alexander McCall Smith have a notion that the US
presidential election would be won by Donald Trump overturning standards of decent behavior?
Could he have been alluding to Hillary Clinton as being a self-seeking
politician? Was he referring to what goes on in many other places in the world?
Or did he intend no allegory at all?
...
No comments:
Post a Comment