Showing posts with label democracy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label democracy. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Deplorable Language

If you repeat the lie often enough…
.
Hank: I feel insulted being addressed as if I were 6 years old.
.
Depp: Insulted by libellous language?
.
"EVERYONE knows…
they're BAD people… 
I alone can fix it.
Hank: No, being talked down to with overly simple expressions like, “She’s a very bad person,” and “They’re bad people.” Using unsupported sweeping generalizations like, “Everybody knows,” with no proof as to who says it. Or megalomanic pronouncements like, “I alone can fix it.” That’s how some people talk to kids.
.
Depp: But it simplifies the message, it appeals to a certain swath of voters.
.
Hank: Deplorables? Whoops, sorry. E.M. Forster wrote an essay called “Two Cheers for Democracy”. Forster understood the danger. “Two cheers for democracy: one because it admits variety and two because it permits criticism. Two cheers are quite enough: There is no occasion to give three.” That’s what Forster said.

____________
Voice-over

Countless memes comparing Trump with Hitler (sometimes inadvisedly) have been circulating for months. But this comparison is about language use, attitudes, conspiracy theories and extremism. That is how Hitler started out. We are not comparing track records in heinous acts. People who don’t understand the dangers of conspiracy theories and extremism often dismiss non-adherents as educated elites. As if schooling was something to be ashamed of. In this case, a little education, a little knowledge of history, could nip a calamitous consequence in the bud.
...

Saturday, August 11, 2012

Hitler and Churchill: Watercolorists

Villain, Hero, Artistic Argument
Hitler and Churchill discuss art…
Hitler:
Make the painting big, make it simple, and eventually it becomes a cultural icon.
Churchill:
Painting a picture is like trying to fight a battle.
Hitler
: As for the degenerate artists, I forbid them to force their so-called experiences upon the public. If they do see fields blue, they are deranged, and should go to an asylum. If they only pretend to see them blue, they are criminals, and should go to prison. I will purge the nation of them.
Churchill: I cannot pretend to be impartial about the colors. I rejoice with the brilliant ones, and am genuinely sorry for the poor browns.
Hitler:
Germany will either be a world power or will not be at all. The great strength of the totalitarian state is that it forces those who fear it to imitate it.
Churchill: At one side of the palette there is white, at the other black; and neither is ever used neat.

Hitler: I am an artist, not a politician. I want to end my life as an artist.
Churchill:
When I die and go to heaven, I want to spend the first million years painting – so I can get to the bottom of the subject.
_________

Voice-over
Hitler and Churchill.
One was a villain.
One was a hero.
Together they created the epic of a terrible war.

Some might argue that, just as police and criminals are opposite sides of the same coin, Hitler and Churchill had a lot in common (for a comparison and contrast of the two go here).

But looking at Hitler’s and Churchill’s pronouncements about art, it is clear that Hitler had a totalitarian view of art whereas Churchill, for all his forthright prose, approached art as a challenge in the arena of democracy.

Sunday, December 7, 2008

Two cheers for Democracy


As they cross the bridge, Narong and Vijay discuss what democracy means.

 ...


Narong: Democracy? Majority rule, I guess.


Vijay: And in Thailand, that’s the problem. Majority rule. But without responsible government the rights of a minority can be abused by the tyranny of the majority. Like now.


Narong: Democracy is supposed to mean that someone comes along and says, “Vote for me and I’ll get you this.” He or she presents an idea, makes a promise.


Vijay: But what we are objecting to is that in rural Thailand, and this was something that Thaksin exploited, was that if you go along and say “Here’s some cash, vote for me,” that's not fair government.


Narong: What’s the difference? In the first case, a politician says “Vote for me,” and gives a long-term reward, and in the second case, the politician says “Vote for me,” and gives a short term reward.


Vijay: But the central idea is that the first politician has ideas to make society better and fairer. The second politician may or may not have these ideas, but by distributing cash, he just wants to get into power.


Narong: But the poor rural voter is saying, “Promises, promises. Heard all this before. Show me the money.” That’s what they respond to.

_________

Voice-over

It could be quite some time until Thailand can have elections that are competitive as well as being procedurally fair.

...