Tool comparison
Peter: When you want low-level footage a small drone is unbeatable. You just float it where no hand-held camera could reach.Fiona: But with the Osmo, I can get right up close to faces and details. No rotor wash blowing grass flat or scaring animals or bird strikes.
Peter: Low passes over water are a breeze. Zero wobble from walking or breathing.
Fiona: And when I want a “glide along the footpath” feeling, the Pocket’s gimbal gives me near-dolly smoothness, without worrying about GPS dropout or trees.
Peter: But the aerial perspective adds drama. Even one metre up makes a scene feel bigger.
Fiona: And one metre down creates intimacy. I can kneel down and tuck the camera into corners, a drone would crash.
Peter: OK, indoors drones struggle. Obstacle avoidance. Curtains.
Fiona: Indoors is where the Osmo shines. Stairwells, corridors, kitchens. Instant set-up, no permissions.
Peter: But outdoors, drones win on stability. The drone doesn’t notice if I’m tired. It stays steady.
Fiona: Outdoors I win on spontaneity. The Osmo is in my pocket. No boot-up delay, no compass calibration.
Peter: I envy how you can keep shooting in wind.
Fiona: And I envy how you can float above puddles without getting your shoes soaked.
_____________
Voice-over
Maybe drones often do the impossible, Osmo handles the sensible. And if you want a cats-eye view, use a floor level dolly. There are filmmakers who are using an Osmo on a stick to achieve drone-like footage. Ian Andersen gives a tutorial.














