Showing posts with label present continuous. Show all posts
Showing posts with label present continuous. Show all posts

Thursday, September 2, 2010

Present continuous and trending

...

Joey and Gaynor drive Orchard Road.

Joey: Auction. Saturday.

Gaynor: Bet it’ll go.

Joey: Bet it doesn’t, too.

Gaynor: Mainlanders. Some mainlander will grab it. Just like that bank building in Hong Kong last month.

Joey: Hmm. They aren’t snapping up everything.

Gaynor: They’re everywhere. They’re buying properties in Hong Kong and I hear they’re buying properties here in Singapore.

Joey: You’re using the present continuous again. You’re always doing that. Makes it look like a trend.

Gaynor: What should I say?

Joey: You should say, “Some mainlander bought the bank building last month.” Leave it at that. Simple past. One case doesn’t prove a trend.

Gaynor: But it is a trend.

Joey: Got another example?

Gaynor: Well, there’s… umm.

Joey: No trend? Only one case? Rest is hearsay? Simple past is what you use.

Gaynor: Pedant.

______________

Voice-over

Joey has a point. Unattributed source + Verb-ing = unsubstantiated rumor.

But Gaynor also has a point. The unfelt earthquake far away under the sea can arrive suddenly as a tsunami.

...

Sunday, April 13, 2008

Cyclical argument

Anil wonders if the problem is in the ignition switch.

...
Dipak:I don't think so.

Anil: Then what are you thinking the problem could be?

Dipak: These machines are a problem. We are relying on them so much they are ruling our lives and governing our behavior.

Anil: That's all very well but we must be arriving at Chandrapore before dark.

Dipak: You see? If we were not having a machine we would not have been setting out for Chandrapore.

Anil: I am beginning to see what you are saying. And if we did not have to go to Chandrapore we would not have to be relying on this machine.

Dipak: Life was simpler when we walked everywhere.

____________

Voiceover

It is not only Dipak and Anil’s names which identify them as Indian. Their use of the present continuous (“What are you thinking…?”) where other speakers of English would be more likely to use the present simple (“What do you think…?”) also gives them away. David Crystal has suggested that since the number of Indian speakers of English outnumbers all native speakers of English, the present continuous might be displacing the present simple in global English.

The other issue touched on by Dipak and Anil here is that of circular reasoning. If they were not having a motorcycle, they would not have been going to Chandrapore, and if they hadn’t been setting out for Chandrapore they would not have been relying on an unreliable machine.

It is not only Dipak and Anil who becme ensnared by circular reasoning. When Descartes wrote, “I think, therefore I am,” he was employing a circular reasoning because by saying, “I think…” he was already declaring that he existed.

Perhaps life was simpler when we communicated only using the simple present.

...