Showing posts with label C.T. Natusch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label C.T. Natusch. Show all posts

Sunday, September 13, 2026

A Heritage Property For Sale

Cousins talking…


Antonio: The front façade, that classic CT Natusch Tudor style. Properly proportioned, steep gables, timber detailing.

Jocelyn: The front is the strongest part. It’s the kind of house you’d stop and photograph. But once you scroll through the photos… well, the story changes.

Antonio: The interior surprised me. All that rimu. Warm, honeyed, still intact. It feels like stepping into 1893. But then the back of the house… it’s like someone stapled extra rooms on without thinking.

Jocelyn: Yes. The section is narrow, and the further back you go, the more it looks like a patchwork quilt.

Antonio: The price though, half a mill, is tempting. For a Natusch original, that’s almost a bargain. But is this a restoration project or a money pit? The back looks like it would need structural reconsideration, not just cosmetic work.

Jocelyn: And Masterton isn’t exactly booming. You’d have to love the house for what it represents, not what it currently is.

Antonio: True. It’s not a strategic investment. It’s a sentimental one. A heritage one. A ‘great-grandfather built this’ one.

Jocelyn: Sentiment doesn’t pay for rewiring, replumbing, reroofing, and re-everything-ing.

Antonio: I wonder if the front could be preserved, and the back rebuilt entirely. But that’s a major undertaking. And probably wouldn’t be allowed by Heritage rules.

Jocelyn: And you’re not living in Masterton. You’d be managing a heritage restoration remotely.

Antonio: The front is stunning, but the whole property feels like a compromise.

Jocelyn: I agree. If the back were even halfway sympathetic to the original design, I’d say go for a look. But as it stands…

Antonio: …maybe it’s better to let someone else take on the project. Someone local. Someone who wants a challenge.

Jocelyn: So to conclude: not to buy, and maybe not even a look-see. We honor the history, but we don’t inherit the renovation.

_____________

Voice-over

Sentimental value doesn’t outweigh the structural, financial, and logistical realities. The house’s front is a treasure; the back is a burden. Admiration without acquisition becomes the elegant choice.

Monday, October 6, 2025

Offer of designing a hotel

1885 Job interview…
Lady Burdett-Coutts: I heard you picked up a building and moved it.
CT: Ah, yes. Chicago. It had its difficulties, being brick. Some fell off. But we did it. Big crane. Leverage. Steam. Lifted it up, turned it around and plonked it down on the piles prepared on the other side of the street.
LBC: My advisors were impressed. So they suggested you design a hotel for Southend on Sea. In brick. It would not need lifting.
CT: I have a year ahead of me.
LBC: You are not staying in England?
CT. It remains to be seen. There are opportunities in the Antipodes I hear.
LBC: Ah, you’ve been reading Samuel Butler?
CT: Actually the New Zealand Company prospectuses.
LBC: Well, we’d better press you into service before you leave us again.
___________
Voice-over
Who knows what other buildings CT would have designed in England? But he migrated to other shores, other stories. But before setting sail, he left this one which stood for eighty years.

Westward Ho

Monday, July 22, 2024

Woburn, Lower Hutt

In the archive…

Michael: I'm looking for any early photos you might have of a property called Woburn, designed by C.T. Natusch. Quite a mansion, with ornate facades, beautiful door and window surrounds, and attention to aesthetic details.
Aaron:
Let me check. Woburn, you said? I believe we do have a sketch of Woburn in our records. It shows the whole building.

Michael:
 Nice to know that there are records of it. Unfortunately, the house was bulldozed down some time ago.
Aaron:
 Yes, shame when significant architecture is destroyed. Ah, here’s the sketch.
Michael: 
I also have a later photo from the National Library. Interesting to compare. 
_________
Voice-over
Mansions often showcase the wealth and status of families. This one, built for Edward Vivian Riddiford (1842-1934), son of wealthy runholder Edward Joshua Riddiford (1879-1911), did just that.