Showing posts with label dialogue. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dialogue. Show all posts

Sunday, August 16, 2026

Four Seasons: Developing an Alda tale into a Fey play

Back to the original movie... 

1981
Liz: I remember really liking Alan Alda’s The Four Seasons.

Eric: Yes. Three couples, holidays, marriages going slightly wrong, people getting older. No serial killers, no dystopian future, no superheroes.

Liz: And the Netflix Four Seasons series keeps that quality. Comedy, yes, but also about people talking.

Eric: And I think Tina Fey understood that the original film’s great asset wasn't really the plot. It was the ensemble. Exploring those relationships over eight episodes.

Liz: And I liked that she didn’t simply turn everybody into Tina Fey characters.

Eric: Mm. Important. Although she plays Kate, she gives the other actors room. And there’s another interesting thing about the production, the directing.

Liz: You mean the actors directing episodes?

Eric: Yes. Colman Domingo directed an episode, actually directing himself while acting. Tina Fey herself directed an episode. The cast taking over some responsibility rather than simply turning up and performing.

Liz: Tina Fey making it participatory?

Eric: I think so. Her greatest skill isn’t coming up with jokes. It’s creating conversations in which people reveal themselves. Casual dialogue, people interrupting, changing the subject, making a joke because they don't want to answer something, but underneath it there’s something happening.

Liz: Harder to write than a punchline.

Eric: Especially with six characters who have known each other for decades. They need histories. A remark has to sound as though it’s the umpteenth time they’ve had that argument, not the first time the writers thought of it.

Liz: Alda made a pretty good film. Fey had to work out how to make that idea keep going.

_________

Voice-over
In the original Alan Alda Four Seasons we spent time with people. Tina Fey gives you the pleasure, and sometimes the discomfort, of wondering what happens when people like this have to keep living together after something terrible happens. She kept the essence of the Alan Alda film without simply doing a remake of it. 

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Tintin: Comic to Film?


Tintin and Haddock ponder their migration from book to screen.

Tintin: What would HergĂ© have thought of us?
Haddock: Turning in his grave likely.
Tintin: Wish we had better lines to speak.
Haddock: Too right! It’s getting boring saying “Billions of blue blistering barnacles” over and over again.
Tintin: Think we should have stayed home in the comic. Everybody applauded us there.

______________
Voice-over
What’s not to applaud? Why did the movie drag for so many people? Why did so many of us get restless and not even grin? The movie begins well, it looks good. Give it 50% for looks?

The flaw. Pragmatically, the dialogue is stilted and wooden. Sure, a movie should be action, and too much talk will slow it down and clutter it up. But in TinTin and the Secret of the Unicorn, too much action clutters it up, and talk drags it down (e.g. when Thompson and Thomson stumble on the wallet pickpocket). HergĂ©’s light lilt doesn’t migrate across the media.
Action movies can be elevated by decent dialogue. Some comics should stay comics. At least until a dialogue doctor checks out the lines. Sorry.
...

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

You're either with us or against us

Joseph, veteran political speech analyst, is asked by an interviewer whether Barack Obama will be different from George Bush.

...

Joseph: If you look at the speeches they make, you see differences. George Bush uses a lot of the first person: “ I will not yield; I will not rest; I will not relent in waging this struggle for freedom and security.”


Interviewer: Whereas Barack Obama…?


Joseph: Barack Obama uses “We” a lot. “We face a lot of problems.”


Interviewer: So this shows a difference in style? George Bush tends to be unilateral, Barack Obama, multilateral?


Joseph: Definitely. And there’s another defining characteristic between them. George Bush, talking about terrorism, used the expression, “You’re either with us or against us.” It’s a polarizing expression. Black vs. white. No room in the middle for maneouvering.


Interviewer: Or dialogue presumably.


Joseph: Right. A zero tolerancy approach. Hard power. Barack Obama, on the other hand, is a proponent of soft power. It’s a multinational world. “I will listen to you, especially when we disagree.”


Interviewer: The speechmaker molds the leader we see?


Joseph: Partly. But an authoritarian, polarizing approach can also be a reflection of an insecure leader. They put up false dilemmas. Either… or… The secure leader listens and synthesizes. 

...

Thursday, December 27, 2007

Kamishibai remix

Atsuko borrows some techniques of kamishibai for an audition.

Oliver: Why is she moving back and forth?

Ned: Well, first she speaks one part and then she speaks the other.

Oliver: She’s telling a story?

Ned: Through dialogue, yes.

Oliver: And pictures too.

Ned: It almost looks like she has done a remix, putting together a ventriloquist act with kamishibai.

Oliver: Kamishibai?

Ned: A story told using pictures and a frame.

Oliver: Refreshing change from the gravity of Gore, but she could use a little coaching on voices and maybe a couple more pictures.


Atsuko's performance here>