Prof. Lang: They were both 78.
Prof. Ling: Yes. Yes. So what else did
they have in common?
Prof. Ling: All human beings have
language. What else?
Prof. Lang: Both had obituaries published
widely.
Prof. Ling: What was different about
them?
Prof. Lang: Well, Geoffrey Leech could
see how language worked. He was good at describing systems. Pierre Ryckmans
could see through rhetoric. He could tell us how millions of Chinese were duped
by Mao.
Prof. Ling: I asked what was different
about their obituaries.
Prof. Lang: Yes. Oh yes. Stylistics.
Leech knew stylistics but his obituary wasn’t exactly stylish. Ryckmans didn’t
study stylistics but his obituary was stylistically crafted. It’s important who
you get to write your obituary.
Prof. Ling: Nevertheless, great men,
both.
__________________
Voice-over
Examples from the
Geoffrey Leech’s and Pierre Ryckmans’ obituaries:
Life…
“Geoff Leech was born in Gloucester in
1936. He studied at University College London for his BA, MA, and PhD, and
taught there as a lecturer. He came to Lancaster in 1969 as one of the first
language specialists in the English Department, and in 1974 he became the first
Head of the new Linguistics Department, and its first Professor.”
“Writers choose pen names for many
reasons. Pierre Ryckmans chose his—“Simon Leys”—to avoid being blacklisted by
the Chinese authorities, who, he feared, would not appreciate his attempts to
tell the world the truth about the horrors of Maoism and the Cultural
Revolution. But his chosen surname contained a subtle clue as to who he really
was. “Leys” was a homage to “RenĂ© Leys”, a novel by the French author Victor Segalen,
in which a Belgian teenager in old Peking regales his employer with tales of
the hidden intrigues and conspiracies taking place within the imperial palace.”
The Economist, August 23rd,
2014.
Accomplishments…
“Geoff made major contributions to such fields as stylistics, (A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry [1969] and, with Mick Short, Style in Fiction [1981]), and semantics and pragmatics (Principles of Pragmatics [1983] remains a key text in the field, and his new book, The Pragmatics of Politeness, appeared just last week). He also contributed to the two major descriptive grammars of English, and many shorter, more accessible grammars for students and teachers. He is perhaps best known now as one of the founders of the field of corpus linguistics, the construction and study of large computerized datasets of language. This field has now become one of the major approaches to many linguistic and social science issues.”
http://wp.lancs.ac.uk/geoffreyleech/
“Geoff made major contributions to such fields as stylistics, (A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry [1969] and, with Mick Short, Style in Fiction [1981]), and semantics and pragmatics (Principles of Pragmatics [1983] remains a key text in the field, and his new book, The Pragmatics of Politeness, appeared just last week). He also contributed to the two major descriptive grammars of English, and many shorter, more accessible grammars for students and teachers. He is perhaps best known now as one of the founders of the field of corpus linguistics, the construction and study of large computerized datasets of language. This field has now become one of the major approaches to many linguistic and social science issues.”
http://wp.lancs.ac.uk/geoffreyleech/
“Mr Ryckmans
predicted that, one day, the chaos of the Mao years would fade and that the
Communist Party’s totalitarian grip would ease. Sure enough, these days even
the party admits that the Cultural Revolution was a “disaster”, and that
millions died in the famine that followed the Great Leap Forward, an earlier
attempt at collectivisation. But the fundamental nature of the regime, he said,
would not change. He was right about that, too.”
The Economist, August 23rd, 2014.
…
The Economist, August 23rd, 2014.
…
No comments:
Post a Comment