Showing posts with label graphs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label graphs. Show all posts

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Neutral vs bias

As the journalist said to the linguist…
Linguist: Verbs, adjectives and adverbs… they range from neutral through bias to outright hostile.
Journalist: What’s the difference between neutral and bias?
Linguist: A biased expression is one which can’t be replaced by a more neutral one. For example, saying "Your position is utterly wrong" could be expressed more neutrally as "You may be mistaken."
Journalist: A word cloud shows it better than just talking about it.
Linguist: Good idea. Then graph it.

________
Voice-over
But the distinction between bias and hostile is fuzzy. Better to subsume hostile into bias.
...

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Graphing and Mapping 1812


Clément and Minard discuss Napoleon’s Russian campaign…
Clément: How would you tell the story?
Napoleon's losses on the
Russian Campaign 1812
Minard: Graph it. 
Months on the independent variable. Soldier deaths the dependent. Numbers are dramatic. Simple.
Clément: OK, so that’s the What, When, Who. What about the Where? Where does the where go?
Minard: Hmm.
Clément: And the whys? The temperatures, Moscow deserted, Berezina river crossing, these all decimated Napoleon’s army.
Minard: Oui. Comment à ce sujet? We use a line of decreasing size, east to west and back. Splits and rejoins. Dates plotted. Weather temperatures falling along the retreat.
Clément: Magnifique!
___________
Voice-over
Beginning from a simple account of numbers a story is built. And told on a graph.
Charles Minard did it brilliantly in 1869. He puts “art” in the chart.
Edward Tufte says it "may well be the best statistical graphic ever drawn."
See a short film about visual graphics at http://youtu.be/fp8gmYE8Xuo
What is your opinion about the design of visual graphics?

Figurative map of French Army losses
on the 1812 Russian Campaign
…